SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77532

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANDEEP BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on : 08.05.2026 Sandeep Bansal ......Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ......Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Briejnder Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Parveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

****

SANJAY VASHISTH, J.

1. Petitioner, namely Sandeep Bansal, aged 54 years, has filed the present petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, seeking quashing of the order dated 13.03.2026 (P-1) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Naraingarh whereby the bail of the petitioner was cancelled, his bail bonds were forfeited to the State, and non-bailable warrants were issued against him, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was initially granted bail after his appearance on 11.07.2024 (Annexure P-3) and charges were framed on 06.08.2025 (Annexure P-4), with the matter fixed for prosecution evidence on 24.02.2026. However, due to inadvertent miscommunication of dates by counsel, petitioner remained absent on 24.02.2026, and thereafter on 13.03.2026, when he was out of station at Varanasi. An exe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top