SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77541

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AVTAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Avtar Singh ..Appellant Versus State of Punjab and anr. ..Respondents Reserved on: 05.05.2026 Pronounced on: 07.05.2026 Uploaded on: 08.05.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Monika Jalota, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab.

* * * * *

SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J.

1. The present regular second appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 24.08.1992 passed by learned Sub Judge (2nd Class), Anandpur Sahib as well as judgment and decree dated 27.07.1995

well as appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed respectively.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

2. Brief facts of the case as per civil suit are that the appellant was

posted as ASI at Police Station. He joined service in Indian Armed Force in

the Indian Navy and served there for continuous period for ten years from

21.01.1964 to 20.01.1974 and he also served during National Emergency Period. He was released from there on completion of 10 years and was paid gratuity also. He joined Punjab Police Wireless Service on 05.04.1976. Thereafte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top