SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77559

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DURGA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Durga Devi ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana and another ....Respondent Date of decision: 07.05.2026 Date of Uploading : 07.05.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sankalp Gehlawat, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 439(2) of the IPC/482(2) of the BNSS seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 06.03.2026 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak in FIR No.43 dated 25.02.2026 registered for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 333, 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and Sections

109(1) of BNS (added later on) at Police Station Sadar Rohtak.

2. The relevant portion of the order passed by Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, reads as under:

“7. Since, no specific role of the applicant-accused has been attributed. Neither any injury has been attributed at the hand of the applicant-accused. The main accused Mohit has already been arrested. The recovery has already been effected. She is ready to join the investigation. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid observations no case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top