IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122)

Date of Decision:-07.05.2026 BALBIR SINGH … Petitioner Versus BALWINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ... Respondents -.-

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Pushpinder Kaushal, Advocate, and Mr. Devansh Pandit, Advocate, for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed assailing the order dated 17.04.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Kharar (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Trial Court”), whereby the learned Trial Court, vide the impugned order, closed the evidence of the petitioner/plaintiff by order.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order is patently arbitrary, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, and non- speaking in nature. It has further been contended that on the previous date of hearing, on which the impugned order came to be passed, the petitioner had tendered his examination-in-chief and his cross-examination was deferred to the next date. However, on the said date, the petitioner could not appear before the learned Trial Court on account of a misc