IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anoop Chitkara, Sukhvinder Kaur, JJ
R.... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRA-D-552-2026 (O&M)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of a fundamental sentencing defect in the trial of a child as an adult. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. reconciliation of mandatory sentencing under section 302 ipc with the restrictive provisions of section 21 of the jj act. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. judicial consensus that sentences less than life imprisonment for murder are legally unsustainable. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. necessity of remanding the case for correct sentencing to prevent prejudice to the accused. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | 638 | Dated | 05.11.2022 | Police Station | City Bhiwani | Sections | 294, 302, 506 r/w 34 IPC |
| Criminal Case Number in the Trial Court | SC/47/2023 | ||||||
| CNR No. | HRBH010024562023 | ||||||
| Date of Decision | 10/13.03.2026 | ||||||
| Convict’s name | Penal provision | Sentence |
| Rxxxxx | 506 r/w 34 IPC | RI for 06 months with a fine of Rs. 200/- |
| 302 r/w 34 IPC | RI for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 5000/- |
1. Challenging the above captioned judgment of conviction and sentence, the convict, who is a CCL, has come up before this Court by filing the present criminal appeal.
2. We have heard counsel for the appellant and State, and instead of admitting the matter for final hearing, we have noticed one fundamental defect which must be addressed at the initial stage itself, because if not cured at this stage, it would further delay proceedings, put the convict in a queue which would be later than that of today, and serve no purpose.
3. The fundamental defect that is noticeable is in the sentencing portion of the impugned judgment. As per the impugned judgment, the appellant was treated as a child but was tried as an Adult as mandated in §19 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter called the ‘JJ Act’) in the above captioned trial. The trial Court held the present appellant guilty of the commission of offenses punishable under §§506 and 302, read with §34 of the IPC.
4. The learned trial Judge heard the child on the quantum of sentence and vide a separate order dated March 13, 2026, sentenced the child under §506 r/w 34 IPC for RI for 06 months and a fine of Rs. 200/-, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo a simple imprisonment for one week. We are not stating anything regarding this portion of the sentence.
5. The problematic and illegal portion is the next sentence under §302, read with 34 IPC. The learned trial Judge imposed a sentence of RI for a period of 10 years and directed payment of a fine of Rs. 5000/-, and, in default of payment of the fine, the convict shall further undergo simple imprisonment for 03 months. On the face of it, this sentence is contrary to the basic statutory provision of §302 IPC, which provides for only two sentences, i.e., either life imprisonment or death. Nowhere is it mentioned that under §302 IPC, the sentence can be for 10 years.
6. It shall be relevant to extract the following provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter called the ‘JJ Act’):
19. Powers of Children’s Court.—(1) After the receipt of preliminary assessment from the Board under section 15, the Children’s Court may decide that—
(i) there is a need for trial of the child as an adult as per the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) and pass appropriate orders after trial subject to the provisions of this section and section 21, considering the special needs of the child, the tenets of fair trial and maintaining a child friendly atmosphere;
(ii) there is no need for trial of the child as an adult and may conduct an inquiry as a Board and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the provisions of section 18.
(2) The Children’s Court shall ensure that the final order, with regard to a child in conflict with law, shall include an individual care plan for the rehabilitation of child, including follow up by the probation officer or the District Child Protection Unit or a social worker.
(3) The Children’s Court shall ensur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.