SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77608

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
YASHPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Yash Pal Singh ....Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ....Respondent Date of decision: 07.05.2026 Date of Uploading : 07.05.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. K.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG Haryana.

Mr. Najar Singh, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking grant of anticipatory/pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 in FIR No.187 dated 11.07.2025 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Baldev Nagar, District Ambala.

2. As per the prosecution case, complainant Sanjeev Kumar, who is stated to be engaged in the power sector business at Faridabad has alleged that about one year prior to registration of the FIR, he came in contact with co-accused Brahm Prakash, a property dealer, who represented that he could facilitate purchase of land situated near Grain Market, Mohra, Ambala. It has been alleged that Brahm Prakash introduced the complainant to the Yash Pal (petitioner herein) and one Patwari namely Parveen Kumar. As per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top