SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77640

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSHIT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CRA-S-1099-2026 (O&M)

DATE OF DECISION :07.05.2026 HARSHIT .....APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

.....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Argued by: Mr. Johan Kumar, Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Deepali Verma, AAG Haryana assisted by ASI Rinku.

Mr. Sanyam Khetarpal, Advocate for the respondents No.2 and 3. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.

This appeal has been filed by the appellant, who is facing a prosecution for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 115, 127(2), 190, 191(3), 324(4), 351(2) of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’ and Section 3 of ‘the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989’, hereinafter being referred to as ‘SC/ST Act’. For the commission of abovementioned offence, the FIR No.301 dated 28.09.2025 has been lodged in Police Station Saran, Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2. As per appellant, in the abovementioned case, he had approached the Court of learned Special Judge, designated under SC/ST Act, for grant of anticipatory bail, but the learned Special Judge, by virtue of order dated 24.03.2026, hereinafter being referred to as ‘impugned order’,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top