109 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-500-2008 (O&M)

Reserved on 09.02.2026 Pronounced on : 06.05.2026 Uploaded on : 06.05.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is pronounced? No Whether full judgment is pronounced? Yes Mukand Kaur & ors. ….Appellants Versus Smt. Middo & ors. ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *****

Present:- Mr. Mukul Goyal, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate for respondents No.21 & 22. None for other respondents.

***

PANKAJ JAIN, J.

1 Plaintiffs are in second appeal. For convenience, parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit, i.e. the appellants as plaintiffs No.6 to 16 and respondents as defendants. Appellants No.10 & 11 are LRs of plaintiff No.16.

2 Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking decree of declaration to the effect that they have become owners of the suit property as detailed out in the head note of the plaint being in continuous long and hostile possession. Plaintiffs further sought decree of permanent injunction seeking restrain against the defendants from interfering in their peaceful possession.

3 As per plaintiffs, they are co-sharers in the suit land measu