277 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2113-2023 (O&M)

Date of decision: 06.05.2026 Anand ...Petitioner Versus Dayanand and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Binat Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ravinder Rana, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 13.03.2023 (Annexure P-7) passed by the trial Court, whereby the objections filed by the petitioner have been dismissed.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:-

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is Judgment Debtor No.1 and after the passing of the decree by the First Appellate Court, he has purchased a part of the joint land vide sale deed dated 18.01.2023 and has become co-sharer in the property and had thus, filed objections to the effect that the said decree should not be executed against him. It is submitted that the objections have been dismissed vide order dated 13.03.2023 which order is not in accordance with law and deserves to be set aside.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT NO.1:-

3. Learned cou