SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77785

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAM KUMAR AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BAL KISHAN @ BALLU RAM AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (111)

Date of Decision:-24.04.2026 Ram Kumar and Others ……Petitioners Versus Bal Kishan @ Ballu Ram and Others ……Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL ****

Present: Mr. Abhimanyuu Kalsy, Advocate, for the petitioners.

****

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking setting aside of the impugned order dated 07.03.2026 (Annexure P-1), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Gurugram, whereby the application filed by the petitioners seeking permission to file objections in the execution petition has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners had earlier filed objections in execution petition bearing No. EXE-271-2024. The learned Executing Court disposed of the said objections and, in consequence thereof, directed the respondent/decree-holder to file a fresh proposed sale deed, adjourning the matter for that purpose. Thereafter, upon filing of the fresh draft sale deed by the decree-holder, the petitioners moved an application seeking an opportunity to file objections to the said proposed sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top