SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77797

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sudeepti Sharma, J
Raj Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Pal – Respondent
FAO-1032-2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Naresh Jain
For the Respondents: Pardeep Kumar

Married daughters are entitled to compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act regardless of financial dependency, and salary components like allowances must be included in the income assessment for compensation, with future prospects and correct personal expenditure deductions applied based on the number of dependents.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - S. 166 - Death in motor accident - Compensation - Quantum - Married daughters are legal representatives entitled to claim compensation regardless of their financial dependency - The deceased's income assessment must include components like house rent allowance and medical reimbursements instead of arbitrary deductions - Personal income tax liability must be calculated based on annual statutory slabs rather than flat percentage deductions - Future prospects for a deceased aged 52 years fixed at 15% - Multiplier fixed at 11 - Personal expenditure deduction for a household with six dependents (widow, mother, father, three daughters, one son) is 1/5th - Consistent awards for conventional heads like loss of estate, funeral expenses, and consortium (spousal, parental, and filial) required - Interest on enhanced compensation awarded at 9% p.a. from date of filing of claim. (Paras 13, 15, 16, 20, 21, 22, 24)

Facts of the case:
The appellants sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of a senior store keeper in a vehicular accident. The Tribunal had erroneously excluded married daughters from dependency, miscalculated income tax liability, and failed to grant appropriate future prospects, leading to an inadequate award.

Findings of Court:
The Court modified the award to Rs.67,39,456/-, an enhancement of Rs.37,41,289/-, directing disbursement with 9% interest.

Issues: Whether married daughters are entitled to compensation; whether allowances should be included in gross salary; and the correct assessment of future prospects and personal expenditure deductions.

Ratio Decidendi: Married daughters are legal representatives within the fold of dependency entitled to claim compensation; benefits like allowances form part of salary, and deductions for personal expenditure must align with the number of dependents as per settled law.

Result: Appeals allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the appeal against the motor accident claims tribunal award. (Para 1 , 2)
2. contentions of appellants for enhancement and respondent for reduction of compensation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. settled law regarding multiplier, future prospects, and consortium heads. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. calculation of income, inclusion of allowances, and correct tax deduction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. legal entitlement of married daughters to compensation irrespective of dependency. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19)
6. correction of future prospects, personal expenditure deduction, and conventional heads. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
7. final calculation of enhanced compensation and direction for disbursement. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 02.04.2016 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants/appellants to the tune of Rs.29,98,167/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, on account of death of Ranjit Ram Singh in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 25.03.2014.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sake of brevity.

SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES

3. The learned counsel for the claimants-appellants contends that the amount assessed by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced. Therefore, he prays that the present appeal be allowed and compensation be enhanced as per latest law.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No. 3-Insurance Company however, vehemently argues that the amount awarded to the claimants is on the higher side. He further contends that the learned Tribunal has erred in law in assessing the income of the deceased.

5. He further submits that respondent No. 3-Insurance Company has filed separate appeal FAO No. 3957-2016 titled as National Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Raj Kumari and others, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded to the claimants by the learned Tribunal. Therefore, he prays for dismissal of the appeal and compensation be reduced as per latest law.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the whole record of this case.

SETTLED LAW ON COMPENSATION

7. Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another [(2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 121], laid down the law on assessment of compensation and the relevant paras of the same are as under:-

“30. Though in some cases the deduction to be made towards personal and living expenses is calculated on the basis of units indicated in Trilok Chandra, the general practice is to apply standardised deductions. Having a considered several subsequent decisions of this Court, we are of the view that where the deceased was married, the deduction towards personal and living expenses of the deceased, should be one-third (1/3rd) where the number of dependent family members is 2 to 3, one-fourth (1/4th) where the number of dependent family members is 4 to 6, and one-fifth (1/5th) where the number of dependent family members exceeds six.

31. Where the deceased was a bachelor and the claimants are the parents, the deduction follows a different principle. In regard to bachelors, normally, 50% is deducted as personal and living expenses, because it is assumed that a bachelor would tend to spend more on himself. Even otherwise, there is also the possibility of his getting married in a short time, in which event the contribution to the parent(s) and siblings is likely to be cut drastically. Further, subject to evidence to the contrary, the father is likely to have his own income and will not be considered as a dependant and the mother

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top