SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77811

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 21.04.2026 Maninder Singh …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present :- Mr. Jasraj Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (formerly Section 482 Cr.P.C.) for setting aside of order dated 02.03.2026 passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dasuya, in case titled as “State of Punjab versus Maninder Singh etc.” (CHI/366/2021), arising out of FIR No.80 dated 07.09.2020, registered under Sections 323, 324, 452, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station Garhdiwal, District Hoshiarpur, whereby learned trial Court has ordered the cross-examination of three prosecution witnesses, namely PW-1 Sarabjit Kaur, PW-2 Puran Chand and PW-11 Baldev Singh, to be treated as ‘Nil’.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order passed by learned trial Court is wholly arbitrary, illegal and against the settled principles of criminal jurisprudence. It is arg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top