SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77820

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PREETI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDER AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (207)

FAO-4407-2018 Date of decision:- 18.04.2026 Preeti and others ...Appellants Versus Mahinder and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Ajay K. Yadav, Advocate for Mr. R.N. Lohan, Advocate, for the appellants.

Mr. Lalit Garg, Advocate, (Through VC), and Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for respondent No.2-insurance company.

****

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. Widow, two minor children and parents of the deceased- Mahabir @ Bintu have filed the present appeal for enhancement. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jind, vide award dated 19.08.2017 had awarded an amount of Rs.4,70,300/- along with interest to the appellants as compensation on account of death of the said Mahabir @ Bintu, which had taken place in an accident that had occurred on 11.05.2012.

2. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the present appellants/claimants had filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter to be referred as “the 1988 Act”) and in paras No.9 and 10 of the award passed by the Tribunal, it was observed that the accident had taken placed on account of involvement of the of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top