IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.115 CRR-1891-2017 Reserved on:-10.04.2026 Pronounced on:-18.04.2026 Uploaded on:- __________

Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment HARINDER PAL @ PAPPU ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- Ms. Navjot Kaur, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

*****

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. The present criminal revision has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 08.05.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehabad as well as judgment/order dated 29.01.2015/ 02.02.2015 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Tohana.

2. Brief facts of the case, as borne out from the record, are that a complaint was received at Police Station City Tohana which was referred to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad, wherein the complainants namely Daljit Singh and Jagjit Singh @ Jagga Singh sons of Sunder Singh, residents of village Simbalwala, Tehsil Tohana, District Fatehabad alleged that on 03.02.2010 acc