IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 18.04.2026 Rajbir and others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Balwan and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Dr. Pankaj Nanhera, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the appellants.

*******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Defendants are in Second Appeal against the judgment of reversal; whereby suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents for permanent injunction although dismissed by the learned Trial Court, has been decreed by the learned First Appellate Court

2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiffs/respondents herein had filed the instant Civil Suit seeking permanent and mandatory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the possession of the plaintiff in the suit land as described in the head note of the plaint. It was pleaded that plaintiffs are owners in possession of suit property measuring 23K-9M as described in the plaint. It was contended that a wrong entry was existing in the revenue record in the name of defendants No.1 to 3 showing them to be in possession of the suit property. Accordingly, the erstwhile owners had filed 2 applications for correction of Khas