IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (227)

Reserved on :- 08.04.2026 Date of Pronouncement:- 17.04.2026 Uploaded on:- 17.04.2026 BASAU RAM (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR … Appellant Versus RAM KUMAR ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Lokendra Singh, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Nitin Verma, Advocate, Mr. Yash Lobra, Advocate, Mr. Anurag Mor, Advocate for the respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (for short, “RSA”) has been instituted by the appellant–plaintiff assailing the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hisar, whereby the appeal preferred by the respondent–defendant came to be allowed and, consequently, the judgment and decree rendered by the learned Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Tohana, stood reversed.

2. The factual matrix of the case, as set out in the plaint, may briefly be delineated as under: the appellant–plaintiff claims ownership over the suit land on the premise that the respondent–defendant, namely Ram Kumar, being the owner in possession thereof, had expressed his intention to alienate the same. It is pleaded that, in order to circum