IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-17.04.2026 CRM-M-19092-2026 MOHSIN @ MOHSEEN ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ......Respondent CRM-M-19323-2026 ARYAN ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Harnanak Singh, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the Petitioner (in CRM-M-19092-2026).
Mr. Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-19323-2026).
Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
***
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.
The prayer in these petitions under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.480 dated 19.12.2025 registered under Sections 22(c) of the NDPS Act (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Taraori, District Karnal.
2. The brief facts of the case are that Sudhir Kumar @ Rohit came to be apprehended with 512 grams capsules of Tramadol. He disclosed that the same was supplied to him by one Aryan (petitioner in CRM-M-19323- 2026). Aryan was apprehended and disclosed that he had been supplied the contraband by Mohsin @ Mohseen (petitioner in CRM-M-19092-2026).
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.