SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77890

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


211 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:-17.04.2026 CRM-M-19092-2026 MOHSIN @ MOHSEEN ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ......Respondent CRM-M-19323-2026 ARYAN ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ......Respondent CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present:- Mr. Harnanak Singh, Advocate for Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the Petitioner (in CRM-M-19092-2026).

Mr. Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate for the petitioner (in CRM-M-19323-2026).

Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

***

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in these petitions under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 is for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No.480 dated 19.12.2025 registered under Sections 22(c) of the NDPS Act (Section 29 of NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Taraori, District Karnal.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Sudhir Kumar @ Rohit came to be apprehended with 512 grams capsules of Tramadol. He disclosed that the same was supplied to him by one Aryan (petitioner in CRM-M-19323- 2026). Aryan was apprehended and disclosed that he had been supplied the contraband by Mohsin @ Mohseen (petitioner in CRM-M-19092-2026).

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners contends

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top