IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment reserved on :06.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on 17.04.2026 RAM MEHAR ... APPELLANT VERSUS DARIYA SINGH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None for the appellant.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

1. RSA No. 1393 of 2002 was taken up along with RSA No. 1550 of 2002 as a connected matter. However, perusal of both the appeals, particularly RSA No. 1393 of 2002, shows that they involve different parties and arise out of distinct cause of action, though the part of land in dispute, i.e., Killa No. 23, in both the appeals is one and the same.

2. Present regular second appeal No. 1393 of 2002 has been preferred by the defendant–appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 31.01.2002 passed by the Additional District Judge, Panipat, whereby the first appeal preferred by the plaintiff was allowed. The plaintiff was held to be the owner in possession of suit land measuring 2 kanals 19 marlas, i.e., 1 kanal 3 marlas on the western side of Killa No. 2, rectangle No. 88, wrongly shown in the name of the defendant, and 1 kanal 16 marlas in Killa No. 23 of rectangle No. 70 already shown in the plaintiff’s nam