SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77899

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNDER LAL – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment reserved on :10.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on 17.04.2026 SUNDER LAL @ SURENDER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS ... APPELLANT VERSUS SHRI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate (through V.C.)

for the appellant.

Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for the respondents.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J.

1. The present regular second appeal has been preferred by unsuccessful appellant-plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 04.09.1997 passed by the Additional District Judge-II, Bhiwani, whereby the first appeal preferred by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.1997 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri, was accepted and the suit of the appellant-plaintiff for permanent injunction was dismissed.

2. Appellant-plaintiff, in his suit for permanent injunction, claimed that the suit property (Bada), shown by letters ABCD in the site plan (Ex. P-1) attached with the plaint, situated within the ‘Lal Dora’ of village Dudiwala Nand Karan, Tehsil Dadri, District Bhiwani, was originally owned by his grandfather, Harsuk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top