IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNDER LAL – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWAN – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Judgment reserved on :10.02.2026 Judgment pronounced on 17.04.2026 SUNDER LAL @ SURENDER SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS ... APPELLANT VERSUS SHRI BHAGWAN AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Mani Ram Verma, Advocate (through V.C.)
for the appellant.
Mr. Akshay Kumar Goel, Advocate for the respondents.
****
PARMOD GOYAL, J.
1. The present regular second appeal has been preferred by unsuccessful appellant-plaintiff being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 04.09.1997 passed by the Additional District Judge-II, Bhiwani, whereby the first appeal preferred by the defendant against the judgment and decree dated 09.01.1997 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri, was accepted and the suit of the appellant-plaintiff for permanent injunction was dismissed.
2. Appellant-plaintiff, in his suit for permanent injunction, claimed that the suit property (Bada), shown by letters ABCD in the site plan (Ex. P-1) attached with the plaint, situated within the ‘Lal Dora’ of village Dudiwala Nand Karan, Tehsil Dadri, District Bhiwani, was originally owned by his grandfather, Harsuk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.