SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 77905

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARMOD KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

206 CRM-M-37947-2025 (O&M)

Date of decision: 17.04.2026 Parmod Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Prateek Garg, Advocate and Ms. Anita Kumari, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.

*****

MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/complainant under Section 483(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No. 2 and 3, namely Sunita Bansal and Madan Lal Bansal, in FIR No. 122 dated 21.03.2023, registered under Sections 406, 420 and 120-B of IPC at Police Station Urban Estate, Hisar, vide order dated 17.06.2025 (Annexure P- 14, whereby they were granted interim bail and then vide order dated 25.06.2025 (Annexure P-16), the interim bail, granted to them, was made absolute by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar.

2. Brief facts of the case relevant for the purpose of disposal of this petition are that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top