227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 01-05-2025 LAKSHMAN DASS ........Petitioner VERSUS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND ORS.

........Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Praveen Chander Goyal, Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral)

1. In the present petition, the challenge is to the award dated 02.12.1999, passed by the Labour Court, copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-10 by which, the grievance of the petitioner that his services have been terminated in violation of the provisions of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 1947 Act), has not been accepted and his claim for reinstatement, continuity of service along with backwages, has been declined.

petitioner-Workman was terminated on 01.06.1996. As per the petitioner- Workman, he had continuously worked for more than 240 days in the 12 months preceeding prior to the said date of termination.

name i.e. Lakshman Dass but on different names, which was being done by the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that keeping in vi