IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

224 Decided on :29.07.2025 AJAIB SINGH . .Petitioner Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL PATIALA AND ORS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI PRESENT: Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondents No. 2 & 3.

****

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)

1. In the present writ petition, the challenge is to the Award dated 08.02.2013 (Annexure P-2) by which, the claim raised by the petitioner that his services have wrongly been terminated by the respondent-department, has been rejected and his claim for reinstatement, continuity in service and full back-wages has been denied and the findings which have been recorded by the labour Court is against the petitioner, which is causing prejudice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that though, in the present case, the charge-sheet dated 28.04.1997 was served upon the petitioner with the allegations that the petitioner has misappropriated Rs. 52/- by not issuing the tickets to 13 passenger on route Patiala to Bassi on 19.03.1997, but said charge has only been proved against the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 28/- hence, the