IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision :29.07.2025 Vinod Kumar and another ......Petitioners Versus Mayawati and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Abhinav Sood, Advocate and Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J . (Oral) :

The present revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the order dated 07.09.2024 (Annexure P- 7), passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Karnal, vide which the application filed by the petitioners-appellants under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) was dismissed.

2. A suit for permanent injunction (Annexure P-1) was filed by the present petitioners which was dismissed by the Court of Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Indri (Karnal), vide judgment and decree dated

23.07.2024 (Annexure P-4).

3. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and decree, an appeal (Annexure P-5) was preferred under Section 96 CPC. The appeal was accompanied by an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC (Annexure P-6) for the grant of ad i