IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:11.09.2025 (cid:1)

Chandgi Ram(since diseased) through LRs and others ... Appellants(cid:1)

Versus (cid:1)

Udmi(since diseased) through LRs ...Respondent(cid:1)

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Parmod Chauhan, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate Mr. Gurdeep Bidhan, Advocate (cid:1)

for the respondent.(cid:1)

***

(cid:1)

AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The defendants are the appellants before this Court challenging the judgment and decree dated 23.01.1990 passed by the learned 1^st Appellate Court vide which the appeal preferred by the respondent-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 20.01.1988 passed by the learned trial Court, whereby suit for permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff was dismissed, has been allowed.

2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that the suit land was jointly owned and possessed by the respondent-plaintiff and appellants-defendants. The appellants-defendants were adamant to raise construction on the said land forcibly and illegally without obtaining any prior partition order. For this purpose, the appellants-defendan