133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : 15.10.2025 RAMAN GOSWAMI ALIAS RAMAN KUMAR AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus VED PARKASH AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4.

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

Present revision petition is directed against order dated

04.09.2023 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Assandh, Karnal whereby application filed by the defendant seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, stands dismissed.

2. Plaintiffs filed suit for declaration with the consequential relief of permanent injunction with joint possession challenging the decree suffered by their predecessor-in-interest namely Phool Gir in Civil Suit No.441 of 1993. As per the averments made in the plaint, the plaintiffs claimed to have come to the knowledge w.r.t. said decree only after the defendants filed suit seeking decree of permanent injunction against them.

3. The defendants filed present application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC claiming that the suit was barred by limitation and thus the plaint needs to be rejec