130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 15.10.2025 Harish Chander ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana for respondents No.1 & 2-State. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned transfer order dated 01.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) with all consequential proceedings including relieving/joining.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner is due to superannuate on 31.08.2026, whereas, vide impugned order dated 01.10.2025 (Annexure P-1), the petitioner has been transferred from District Rewari to District Mewat. The impugned action of transfer is in violation of the transfer policy.

3. Per contra, the learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the fact that the policy provides that the government employees who are due to retire