Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anoop Chitkara, Sukhvinder Kaur, JJ
Sukhdev Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court rectifies procedural error regarding statutory bail provision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. factual basis for uapa and conspiracy charges. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. constitutional rights override restrictive statutory bail provisions. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. prolonged incarceration justifies bail despite grave charges. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. bail conditions must remain reasonable, not punitive. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 6. specified conditions to ensure court appearance and trial. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65) |
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Section |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07 | 16.09.2021 | State Special Operation Cell, District SAS Nagar | 124A1Sedition., 153A2Punishment for knowingly carrying arms in any procession or organising, or holding or taking part in any mass drill or mass training with arms., 153B3153B. Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration., 120B4Punishment of criminal conspiracy. IPC, Sections 175Punishment for raising funds for terrorist act., 186Punishment fo |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
