Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jagmohan Bansal, J
Arun Kumar Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. context and background of the dispute regarding registration marks. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. summary of rival contentions regarding jurisdiction and fee charges. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. central government's exclusive authority to regulate registration marks under the 1988 act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. state government orders and prior court directions regarding registration series replacement. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. final invalidation of the impugned administrative circular. (Para 23 , 24) |
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Advocate and
Mr. Rishabh Aggarwal, Advocate
for the petitioner in CWP-7593-2023.
Mr. Himanshu Raj, Advocate
for the petitioner in CWP-16927-2025, CWP-17080-2025
and CWP-29158-2024 (Through V.C.).
Mr. Surender Dhull, Advocate
for the petitioner in CWP-2022-2022.
Mr. A.V.S. Parmar, Advocate and
Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate
for the petitioner in CWP-1069-2020, CWP-1418-2020
CWP-1816-2020, CWP-9924-2020 and CWP-10048-2020.
Mr. R.D. Yadav, Advocate
for the petitioner in
CWP-30294-2022 and CWP-9664-2023.
Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana.
Ms. Shalini Atri, Senior Panel Counsel
fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
