SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 78305

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
JOGINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMAR SINGH ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH Court OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 20.04.2026 Joginder Singh and others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Amar Singh and others ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Amit Jain, Senior Advocate with Mr. Parit Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants.

***

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

The plaintiffs are in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby the suit filed by the appellants for declaration to the effect that plaintiffs are owners of 5/6th share in the suit land measuring 101K-15M; AND for permanent injunction, has been dismissed by both the District Courts.

2. In order to correctly appreciate the dispute at hand, following pedigree table shall be useful: -

Buta Singh Mastan Singh Karam Singh Bhagwan Kaur Gurdial Kaur Amar Singh Raghbir Singh Def.No.1 Def.No.2 Joginder Singh Avtar Singh Randhir Singh Zora Singh Pff.No.1 Pff.No.2 Pff.No.3 Pff. No.4

3. It was the pleaded case of the appellants that the suit land is Ancestral Joint Hindu Family Coparcenary property. The suit property was inherited by Mastan Singh from his father Buta Singh. On the death of Mastan Singh, mutation of inheritance was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top