IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Nidhi Gupta, J
Rameshwar Dass – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Devi – Respondent
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present second appeal has been filed by the defendants No. 2 and 3 against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned District Courts, whereby suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent No.1, for separate possession by way of partition with consequential relief of permanent injunction, has been decreed by both the District Courts. Defendant No.1 is impleaded herein as proforma respondent No.2.
Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is the real sister of the defendants. Earlier the suit property as described in the plaint was in the ownership of their father Sh. Rup Chand son of Sheo Chand. Rup Chand had died on 06.01.2023 leaving behind the plaintiff and defendants as LRs. It was pleaded in the plaint that after the death of Rup Chand, suit property was owned and possessed in equal share i.e. 1/4th share each, by all the parties. It was alleged that thereafter, suit land was partitioned verbally; and since then, the plaintiff was in unhindered possession upon the suit property. However, now the defendants have become dishonest and in collusion with each other, had sought to dispossess the plaintiff. Plaintiff had requested the defendants not to inte
Narayan Bhagwantrao Gosavi Balajiwale v. Gopal Vinayak Gosavi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.