SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 78426

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARAIN RAM AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 17.04.2026 Narain Ram and others …..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Sukhdip Singh Brar, Advocate with Mr. Udeyveer Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, D.A.G., Punjab.

****

NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant the petitioners the pay scale of Rs.1200-2100 from the date of their joining/retrospectively i.e. 01.01.1986, with all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay/pension etc.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the report of the Pay Commission for the year 1967-68, all the posts of Sub Inspectors including those of Horticulture Supervisor and Nursery Supervisor, Compost Inspector and Grading Assistants were clubbed together and consequently, 60% were granted the pay scale of Rs.130- 200 and the senior most 40% were granted the pay scale of Rs.140-300. However, in the Second Pay Commiss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top