IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NARAIN RAM AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 17.04.2026 Narain Ram and others …..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. Sukhdip Singh Brar, Advocate with Mr. Udeyveer Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, D.A.G., Punjab.
****
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to grant the petitioners the pay scale of Rs.1200-2100 from the date of their joining/retrospectively i.e. 01.01.1986, with all consequential benefits such as arrears of pay/pension etc.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the report of the Pay Commission for the year 1967-68, all the posts of Sub Inspectors including those of Horticulture Supervisor and Nursery Supervisor, Compost Inspector and Grading Assistants were clubbed together and consequently, 60% were granted the pay scale of Rs.130- 200 and the senior most 40% were granted the pay scale of Rs.140-300. However, in the Second Pay Commiss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.