IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANJIT KAUR AND ANR. ......Appellants Vs.

GOLO KAUR AND ORS. .....Respondents Reserved on : 07.04.2026 Pronounced on: 10.04.2026 Uploaded on: 10.04.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Ayush Sarna, Advocate for Mr. Parveen Kumar Garg, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Gaurav Goyal, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Ravneet Singh Joshi, DAG, Punjab for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral)

1. The present regular second appeal is filed against judgment and decree dated 10.08.2018 passed by Additional District Judge, Sangrur, whereby appeal filed by respondent No.1 was allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Anganwadi workers were appointed in the year 2004. However, appointment of respondent No.1 and respondent No.7 were declared illegal and was quashed by this court vide judgment dated 19.04.2010 with the following directions:-

“Consequently and for the reasons afore-stated, the writ petition is allowed. The appointment order dated 18.12.2004 (Annexure P-10) is hereby quashed with the f