IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.208 Date of Decision: 08.04.2026

1) CWP No.894 of 2001 Santosh Kaur and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents

2) CWP No. 3436 of 2001 Amar Singh and others .... Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate, for the petitioners in CWP No.894 of 2001.

None for the petitioners in CWP No.3436 of 2001.

Mr. Aakash Singla, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL)

Both these petitions are being decided together by this common order as the issue involved is identical. For brevity, the facts are being noticed from CWP No.894 of 2001, which has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the memo dated 26.05.2000, Annexure P-7, whereby the case of petitioner no.1 for pay fixation as Head Teacher in the scale of `5500-9000 with effect from 01.01.1996 has been rejected. Further, a direction has been sought to fix the petitioners’ pay in the manner pay of other Language Teachers/Masters in the Department has been fixed.

2. Learned