Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
N. S. Shekhawat, H. S. Grewal, JJ
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of prosecution evidence, fir contents, and investigation details. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. establishment of alibi for accused through military service records. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 3. competing arguments regarding acquittal, evidence, and alibi validity. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. unreliability of sole eyewitness testimony and non-examination of material witnesses. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. failure to prove criminal conspiracy; scope of appellate interference in acquittal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
***
N.S.Shekhawat J.
1. This order shall dispose of above mentioned two cases i.e. CRA-D 314-DBA-2003 titled as “State of Haryana Vs. Suresh Kumar and others” and CRR-563-2003 titled as “Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and others”, which have been filed against the common impugned judgment dated 16.10.2002, passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sonipat, whereby, the private respondents in both the cases were ordered to be acquitted by the trial Court.
2. During the pendency of the present appeal, respondent No.1- Suresh Kumar, respondent No.2, Ishwar, respondent No.6-Ram Singh and respondent No.7 Maha Singh in CRA-D-314-DB
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
