SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 78986

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


****

ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections
204 29.08.2024 Balongi, District SAS Nagar 64, 88 of BNS and 6 of POCSO Act

1. Seeking quashing of impugned order dated 02.03.2026 (Annexure P-3) passed by District Magistrate in the FIR captioned above, whereby the application for grant of parole to the petitioner has been rejected, the convict has come up before this Court by filing the present writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2. The reasons for rejection of petitioner’s parole are mentioned in Annexure P-1 which is information regarding prisoners applying for parole. This report was issued by Senior Superintendent of Police upon reports forwarded by the concerned SHO and DSP of the Police Station.

3. As per Annexure P-1, the prisoner has criminal antecedents under Section 6 of POCSO Act and one case of snatching. The reason for parole is to meet the family members and as per this report, the petitioner has five family members. In column no. 11, it has been mentioned that if released on parole, the petitioner can commit an offense, can abscond, is of dangerous character and is a hard core criminal. In column no. 13, it has been mentioned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top