Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amarinder Singh Grewal, J
Sharda Devi – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding the dismissal of a withdrawal application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. assertion of inadvertent procedural error in the original application. (Para 3) |
| 3. court’s direction to permit a fresh application to serve the interest of justice. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the present Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for setting aside the impugned order dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Narnaul, whereby the application dated 30.04.2026 (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioners for taking up the case bearing No. MACP/342 of 2019 titled as ‘Sharda Devi and another vs. Sunil Kumar and others’ and for considering the statement dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-3) made by the petitioners for withdrawal of the main case with liberty to file a fresh claim petition has been dismissed.
2. As per the order dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P-4), the learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Narnaul, observed that in the statement of the petitioners recorded before the learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, on 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-3), the pet
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
