Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sandeep Moudgil, J
Vipan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims for regularization based on 14 years service under specific government policy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court directs the authority to reconsider the claim based on established judicial precedents. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been instituted invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioners in view of the Government instructions dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P-3), along with all consequential.
2. The petitioners were appointed as SDCs on daily wage basis against regular sanctioned posts on 31.01.2012 and 04.07.2012 respectively in the Panchayati Raj Department and, after change in nomenclature during the year 2015-16, have been working as Accounts Clerks under Outsourcing Policy Part-II. It is averred that the petitioners have rendered continuous and unblemished service for more than 14 years and, despite being eligible under Government instructions dated 18.06.2014 (Annexure P-3) providing for regularization of Group ‘C’ and ‘D’ employees and despite regularization of simila
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
