SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 79322

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Harpreet Singh Brar, J
Manpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited – Respondent
CWP-17293-2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sirat Sapra
For the Respondents: Divanshu Jain

The eligibility for public employment must be judged as of the cut-off date prescribed in the recruitment advertisement; courts will not interfere with such conditions in the absence of manifest arbitrariness or mala fide, as doing so introduces uncertainty and violates the principle of equal opportunity.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226, 227 - Recruitment - Eligibility criteria - Cut-off date - Petitioner challenged the condition in an advertisement prescribing the last date of online application submission as the cut-off for possessing requisite educational qualifications - Petitioner sought relaxation as she was in the process of acquiring the qualification - Held, cut-off date has a reasonable nexus with the object of ensuring certainty and uniformity in recruitment - Court cannot relax eligibility criteria prescribed in the advertisement - Recruitment must adhere strictly to notified terms to maintain transparency and equity. (Paras 4.1, 4.3)

(B) Recruitment Process - Role of Court - Appellate/Writ jurisdiction - Court should not interfere with recruitment conditions unless there is pronounced arbitrariness or mala fide - Fixation of cut-off date is a well-entrenched legal principle to avoid open-ended and disorderly selection processes. (Paras 4.3, 4.6)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner applied for the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical with the respondent corporation. The advertisement mandated candidates to possess the relevant educational qualification by the last date of application. Petitioner, although pursuing her diploma, had not cleared one paper by the cut-off date and sought the court's direction to include her in the selection process.

Findings of Court:
Fixed cut-off dates for eligibility are mandatory and legally binding. The court dismissed the plea, stating that allowing candidates to qualify later would create uncertainty and violate the rights of other candidates by altering established rules midway.

Issues: Whether the cut-off date prescribed in an advertisement for essential qualifications can be challenged as arbitrary and whether a candidate in the process of acquiring qualifications is eligible for recruitment.

Ratio Decidendi: The adherence to a cut-off date for educational qualification in public employment is essential for maintaining fairness, certainty, and equality under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution; arbitrary relaxation of such dates undermines the integrity of the recruitment process.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's grievance and contentions regarding cut-off date eligibility. (Para 1 , 1 , 2)
2. respondent's contention on the sanctity of advertisement terms. (Para 3)
3. court discussion on the importance of cut-off dates and settled service jurisprudence. (Para 4)
4. final outcome and dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)

1. The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India making the following prayers:-

“I. To issue writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing Note (iii) under Clause 2 of the Eligibility Criteria contained in Advertisement No. CRA-316/26 (Annexure P-1), insofar as it prescribes the last date of online application/registration as the cut-off date for possessing the requisite educational qualifications for recruitment to the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical, being arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India;

II. To issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the date of document verification or any other subsequent stage of the recruitment process as the cut-off date for determining possession of the requisite qualifications for recruitment to the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical pursuant to Advertisement No. CRA-316/26, instead of the last date of submission of online applications, in the interest of justice, fairness and equity;

III. To issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to accept the online application and permit the petitioner to appear and participate in the recruitment examination/process for the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical pursuant to Advertisement No. CRA-316/26, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall produce proof of having passed the requisite degree/diploma course on a date subsequent to the cut-off date fixed by the respondent, including at the stage of document verification or any other stage as may be deemed appropriate by this Hon’ble Court during the pendency of the present petition;

IV. To issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent not to reject the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical pursuant to Advertisement No. CRA-316/26 and further directing that till the next date of hearing, no coercive or precipitative steps qua the candidature of the petitioner be taken by the respondent;

V. To further issue appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to edit/correct her online application form or, in the alternative, to accept and consider the candidature/application of the petitioner for recruitment to the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical pursuant to Advertisement No. CRA-316/26 despite the petitioner having mentioned approximate aggregate marks obtained in the diploma course and not having selected the “Result Awaited” option in the online application form, as prescribed under the terms and conditions of the advertisement, inasmuch as the said act was bona fide and without any intention to misrepresent or conceal facts.

VI. To issue writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and decide representation dated 07.05.2026 (Annexure P-9) submitted by the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a time bound manner and to clarify whether candidates like the petitioner, whose final result/certificate is awaited and who are yet to appear in the remaining examination(s), are eligible to apply for the post of Junior Engineer/Electrical under Note (iii) of Clause 2 of Advertisement No. CRA-316/26.”

Contentions of Petitioner

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the respondent-PSPCL issued Advertisement No. CRA-316/26 dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) inviting online applications for recruitment to 622 posts of Junior Engineer/Electrical. As per the terms and conditions of the advertisement, the last date for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top