Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Suvir Sehgal, Deepak Manchanda, JJ
Manish – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure to verify land status causing allotment disruption. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding policy clauses and due diligence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. admission of fault regarding unacquired land by authority. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. arbitrary cancellation lacks due diligence and legal basis. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
****
DEEPAK MANCHANDA, J.
1. Through the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction for allotment of a plot in terms of the allotment letter dated 13.12.2022 (Annexure P-5), or in the alternative, for allotment of an alternative plot of equivalent size in the same vicinity/location at the same price.
2. The facts, as emanating from the pleadings in the present writ petition are that the petitioner was declared as a successful bidder in an e-auction conducted on 27.05.2022, pursuant to which a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 18.07.2022 was issued, followed by an allotment letter dated 13.12.2022 (Annexure P-5). After that the possession of the plot was also offered to the petitioner. However, upon visiting the site, the petitioner discovered certain defects and found that construction had already be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
