IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJIT SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
SATNAM SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL)
1. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 06.09.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the trial Court vide which the evidence of the plaintiffs-petitioners has been closed by order.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have filed a suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiffs are owners in possession as co-sharers of the land in question and has submitted that the delay in the proceedings would primarily prejudice the petitioners. It is submitted that on 14.12.2018, two plaintiff witnesses were present and they were examined-in-chief and their cross-examination was deferred on the request of learned counsel for the defendants and the case was adjourned to 18.01.2019. It is submitted that on 18.01.2019, again the witnesses of the plaintiffs were present but on the request of learned counsel for the defendants, the case was adjourned to 08.02.2019 and that on 08.02.2019, an additional issue was framed. It is submitted that thereafter on certain dates, the Court did not hold proceedings and on some occasion no witness of the plai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.