IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :19.05.2026 HARSHIT SONI ... PETITIONER VERSUS SUCHITA VERMA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside of the impugned order dated 23.03.2026 (Annexure P-8), whereby the evidence of the defendants was closed by the learned Court of first instance, as well as order dated 10.04.2026 (Annexure P-9), whereby the application for furnishing list of witnesses was dismissed with costs of Rs.10,000/-.

2. In the present case, the facts are not much in dispute. The respondents-plaintiffs had filed a suit for possession along with consequential relief of permanent injunction on 07.10.2020 before the learned Civil Judge, Gurugram. Thereafter, petitioner-defendants duly appeared and filed written statement. Issues were framed, and the plaintiff’s evidence was thereafter concluded.

3. Subsequently, the case was fixed for defendants’ evidence on 16.11.2023. During the pendency of the defend