Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sumeet Goel, J
Vineet Arora – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts and the procedural history of the bail application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of arguments by petitioner and the state counsel regarding maintainability and merits. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court holds that second bail petitions require substantial changes in circumstances and justifies custodial interrogation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. formal operative order dismissing the bail petition. (Para 11) |
SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition is the second attempt under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.0019 dated 21.01.2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 140(3), 115, 351(3) of BNS, 2023 at Police Station Ambala City District Ambala.
The petitioner had earlier applied for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail before this Court which was dismissed as withdrawn on 22.04.2026. The relevant part of said order reads as under:-
“3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks to withdraw the petition in hand.
4. Ordered according
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
