IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GAGANDEEP ALIAS GAGAN BANSAL ALIAS KALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
CRM-M_9102_2026
##PAGE1##
CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 -1-
209
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No.9102 of 2026
Date of Decision: 19.05.2026
Gagandeep @ Gagan Bansal @ Kali
….. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
….. Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
*****
Present: Mr. P. S. Jammu, Advocate;
Mr. R. P. S. Jammu, Advocate;
Mr. R. K. Poonia, Advocate and
Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.
*****
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.
1. Present second petition has been filed praying for the grant of
regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.108, dated 12.05.2025,
under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 191(3), 190, 117(2), 110 of BNS,
registered at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.
2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that FIR in the present
case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Sahil
Soni. It was alleged that the complainant was running an Ahata with his
father in Dana Mandi, Killianwali from about 04 months. It was alleged
that Amit Arora @ Shanka often comes to the Ahata and the complainant
was to take Rs.4000/- from him and whenever he demanded money form
RITTU
2026.05.20 10:46
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 -2-
him, he made excuses. It was alleged that on 21.04.2025, in the evening,
Amit Arora @ Shanka came at the Ahata of the complainant and
demanded some food items from him. The complainant demanded his
previous payment from him, however, Amit Arora @ Shanka became
furious and gone from there by saying that I give your money today. It was
alleged that after some time, Amit Arora @ Shanka armed with iron rod,
Noni Arora armed with an axe, Amit Bansal armed with stick, Gagan
Bansal @ Kali (petitioner) armed with iron cutter and Vikas Kumar came
there. Gagan Bansal @ Kali (petitioner) raised a lalkara and told to thew
complainant that money will be given to you. Thereafter, Gagan Bansal @
Kali gave a blow of Kappa, which hit on the head of the complainant and
the complainant received injuries on both sides of his head. Amit Bansal
also gave a blow of stick, which hit on the knee of left leg of the
complainant. Amit Arora @ Shanka also gave blow of iron rod, which hit
on the rear side of left arm of the complainant. Noni Arora gave blow of
stick, which hit on the left shoulder of the complainant. All the accused
gave several beatings to the complainant. However, on raising alarm, all
the accused ran away from the spot along with their respective weapons.
Father of the complainant also reached at the spot and admitted the
complainant in Civil Hospital, Lambi, from where he referred to Civil
Hospital, Badal. He was further referred to AIMS Hospital, Bathinda for
treatment. Thus, the request was made to take legal action against all the
accused persons. On the basis of the same, the FIR was registered. On
registration of the FIR, the investigation commenced. Resultantly, the
petitioner was arrested on 12.09.2025. On completion of the investigation,
the challan was presented and on framing of charges, the trial commenced.
RITTU
2026.05.20 10:46
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 -3-
The petitioner approached the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Sri Muktsar Sahib praying for the grant of regular bail. However, after
hearing both the sides and finding no merit in the same, the learned
Additional Sessions Judge, Sri Muktsar Sahib dismissed the bail
application filed by the petitioner vide order dated 17.11.2025. Being
aggrieved, the petitioner earlier approached this Court praying for the grant
of regular bail by way of filing CRM-M-67513-2025, however the same
was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 05.12.2025. Hence being
aggrieved, the petitioner is again before this Court praying for grant of
regular bail by way of filing the present second petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently contended
that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.