IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GAGANDEEP ALIAS GAGAN BANSAL ALIAS KALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.9102 of 2026 Date of Decision: 19.05.2026 Gagandeep @ Gagan Bansal @ Kali ….. Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ….. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ *****
Present: Mr. P. S. Jammu, Advocate;
Mr. R. P. S. Jammu, Advocate;
Mr. R. K. Poonia, Advocate and Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raj Karan Singh, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.
*****
RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.
1. Present second petition has been filed praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.108, dated 12.05.2025, under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(3), 191(3), 190, 117(2), 110 of BNS, registered at Police Station Lambi, District Sri Muktsar Sahib.
2. Succinctly, the facts of the case are that FIR in the present case was got registered on the statement of complainant, namely, Sahil Soni. It was alleged that the complainant was running an Ahata with his father in Dana Mandi, Killianwali from about 04 months. It was alleged that Amit Arora @ Shanka often comes to the Ahata and the complainant was to take Rs.4000/- from him and whenever he demanded money form him, he made excuses. It was alleged that on 21.04.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.