IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALBIR SINGH & ANR – Appellant
Versus
DARSHAN SINGH TH LRS & ORS – Respondent
CR_6753_2018
##PAGE1##
CR-6753-2018 1
278 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR-6753-2018
Date of decision : 18.05.2026
BALWINDER SINGH & ANR ....Appellants
Versus
DARSHAN SINGH THR. LRS & ORS ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
Present : Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate
for respondents No.5 and 6.
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated
08.05.2018 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Khadur
Sahib, whereby application filed by the petitioner seeking passing of the
final decree of partition of the land, stands rejected.
2. Petitioner filed suit for partition. The same was decreed vide
judgment and decree dated 10.06.2008. Preliminary decree was passed. The
appeal preferred against the same stands dismissed vide judgment and
decree dated 14.05.2009 passed by Additional District Judge, Tarn Taran.
3. As per the decree that has attained finality, the petitioners herein
have been held entitled to the extent of 1/4th share out of the total suit land
measuring 09 Kanal 14 Marlas. The petitioners moved an application for
DEEPAK KUMAR
2026.05.22 09:44
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CR-6753-2018 2
passing of the final decree of partition. The same has been dismissed by the
Trial Court, observing as under:
“5. After hearing both the counsel for the parties and going
through the file carefully, I am of the considered opinion that
applicant/plaintiff alleged that the applicants/plaintiffs are entitled
for 2 kanals 6 marlas out of suit land measuring 9 kanals 14
marlas. They are entitled for their possession on the basis of
preliminary decree and accordingly, the final decree be passed in
their favour of 02 Kanals 6 marlas against the respondent and the
possession of the same be delivered to them. The
applicant/plaintiffs have alleged that they entitled for 2 kanals 6
marlas as per their share but it has not been proved by the
applicants that the share of other co sharers is much more in their
possession than their actual share. They have not proved the fact
that who is in excessive share from whom the applicants/plaintiffs
can recover their possession. Local commissioner was also
appointed, report of Local Commissioner is silent on the said fact
but it has proposed that where the maximum area is lying vacant,
the applicants/plaintiffs should be delivered the possession from
the same. But however it is not legally maintainable when it is not
proved that who is in excessive share of the suit property. Perusal
of report reveals that the possession is to be delivered as per the
proposed partition from the khasra no.486(2-12) where maximum
areas is lying vacant after removing some construction from it
which is raised by the defendants/respondents more than their
share. But the report does not reveals the fact that how much share
they have encroached from which the plaintiff is entitled and
which construction is to be removed. It is also not proved that the
construction can be compensated with monetary relief. It is not
proved by applicant/plaintiff that the remaining co sharers are in
their actual possession of the suit property and only the defendants
residing in khasra no. 486, are in their excessive share and they
have encroached the share of the applicant/plaintiff. The final
decree cannot be passed, it will effect the execution and will make
DEEPAK KUMAR
2026.05.22 09:44
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CR-6753-2018 3
the execution in executable in future. The possession cannot be
delivered to the applicants in such situation. The final decree
cannot be passed without proper demarcation of all the co sharers
in the suits property and also showing which is the co sharer is in
excessive share. There are also passage in the suit property which
is also to be adjusted from the share of the applicants/plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs/applicant is entitled for his share from the person in
excess of his share after making all the adjus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.