Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amarinder Singh Grewal, J
Krishan – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwati Sharma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of trial facts and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. contentions regarding contingent contracts and witness competency. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. assessment of evidence and validity of contingent agreements. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. admissibility of attorney evidence and judicial discretion. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL, J.
1. The defendant is the appellant before this Court, challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.07.1997 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Karnal (hereinafter referred to as the learned trial Court) whereby the suit for specific performance with consequential relief of possession, filed by the plaintiff-respondent has been allowed and the judgment and decree dated 15.11.1999 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Karnal (hereinafter referred to as the learned 1st Appellate Court) vide which the appeal preferred by the defendant against the aforesaid judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court, has been dismissed.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to in terms of their status before the trial court.
3. Succinctly,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
