SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 79804

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M/S KHURANA METAL PVT. LTD. AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
JATINDER SHARMA AND ANR – Respondent


VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

This is defendants’ appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2019 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, whereby the appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 07.05.2018 passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar, was dismissed.

The appeal is accompanied by an application (CM-6340-C-2026) filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of 2469 days’ delay in filing the appeal.

It has been mentioned in the said application that the applicants-appellants, being laymen were not aware of their right to prefer an appeal. Still further, it has been averred that due to lack of funds, the applicants-appellants could not engage a counsel. Reference has also been made to the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 08.03.2021 in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020 IN RE: COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION.

Learned counsel representing the applicants-appellants, while reiterating the averments made in the application seeking condonation of delay, argues that the delay of 2469 days in filing the appeal, is neither intentio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top