IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GAGANDEEP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
CRM-M_23221_2026
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-23221-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(213) CRM-M-23221-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision : 18.05.2026
GAGANDEEP SINGH ... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA
Present: Mr. Robin Singh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana
****
MANISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL)
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section
482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) seeking
grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No.074 dated 27.03.2024
registered under Section 379 of IPC (Sections 411 and 34 of IPC added later on)
at Police Station Farrukh Nagar, Gurugram.
2. The aforementioned FIR was registered on the basis of a written
complaint submitted by the complainant Bijender Kumar, alleging that his
vehicle bearing registration No.RJ-32-GB-7448 was parked by his driver Tejpal
on 24.03.2024 in front of Global Infratech Company, but the same was found
missing on 26.03.2024. After registration of FIR, investigation proceedings had
been initiated. Since no clue about the culprit could be found, an untraceable
report was prepared on 28.04.2024. Subsequently, the accused Sahju, Rashid,
Shakir and Rashid, who were apprehended in another case bearing FIR No.111
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.19 10:05
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE2##CRM-M-23221-2026 (O&M) 2
dated 05.05.2024 registered at Police Station Farrukhnagar, District Gurugram
suffered disclosure statements admitting their involvement in this case and on
the basis of the same, they were nominated as accused and were arrested in this
case as well. On the basis of their disclosure statement, accused Altaf and
Saddam were nominated as additional accused and were arrested. Accused
Altaf suffered a disclosure statement on the basis of which offence under
Section 411 of IPC was added and Khubi @ Rahul was nominated as an
accused. During the course of investigation, accused Kamar Hashmi was
arrested. He too suffered a disclosure statement to the effect that he had sold the
stolen vehicle to the present petitioner. The petitioner was nominated as such.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved an application for grant of
anticipatory bail which has been dismissed by the Court of Learned Sessions
Judge, Gurugram vide order dated 21.04.2026.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that he has been
falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused
Kamar Hashmi which cannot be considered to be legally admissible in evidence.
He is a scrap dealer by profession and used to receive parts of vehicles as scrap.
A part of vehicle bearing Chassis No.MAT704251H3H18822 is alleged to have
been purchased by him, whereas in fact the Chassis No. of the stolen vehicle as
per the Registration Certificate is No.MAT704251H3E11533. No recovery is to
be effected from him. He is ready to join investigation. His custodial
interrogation is not required. His antecedents are clean. It is, therefore, argued
that the petition deserves to be allowed.
AMIT SHARMA
2026.05.19 10:05
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
##PAGE3##CRM-M-23221-2026 (O&M) 3
4. Learned State counsel on the other hand, has argued that the
allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature. For the purpose of
effecting recovery of the stolen vehicle, his custodial interrogation is must. It is,
therefore, argued that the petition does not deserve to be allowed.
5. This Court has heard the rival submissions made by learned counsel
for the parties at considerable length.
6. The petitioner who is a scrap dealer is alleged to have purchased
the stolen vehicle from the accused Kamar Hashmi in April, 2024. Though, the
petitioner has submitted that he had not purchased the stolen vehicle and has
sought to be implicated on account of purchase of a vehicle bearing Chassis No.
MAT704251H3H18822, whereas the Chassis No. of the stolen vehicle is
No.MAT70425
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.