IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PHOOL CHAND – Appellant
Versus
ST OF HRY – Respondent
The trial of the appellant in case FIR No.52, dated 06.07.2003, under Sections 307, 324, 506 IPC, at Police Station Shehzadpur, District Ambala, has culminated into his conviction under the aforesaid heads and he has been substantively sentenced. The appellant has challenged the order of conviction dated 19.11.2004 and order of sentence dated 20.11.2004 by way of present appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant Vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Court, the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned had been directed to record the statements of the parties with regard to the genuineness and authenticity of the compromise.
5. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, has submitted a report, vide letter dated 12.05.2026, which indicates that the parties had appeared before the Magistrate and got recorded their respective statements with regard to the validity of the compromise. As per the report, the compromise arrived at between the parties is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence and out of free will of the parties.
6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
Ors.” 2012(10) SCC 303 has held a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.