IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PHOOL CHAND – Appellant
Versus
ST OF HRY – Respondent
CRA-S_106-SB_2005
##PAGE1##
The trial of the appellant in case FIR No.52, dated 06.07.2003,
under Sections 307, 324, 506 IPC, at Police Station Shehzadpur, District
Ambala, has culminated into his conviction under the aforesaid heads and he
has been substantively sentenced. The appellant has challenged the order of
conviction dated 19.11.2004 and order of sentence dated 20.11.2004 by way
of present appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant
POONAM NEGI
2026.05.15 16:34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##Vide order dated 23.04.2026 passed by this Court, the trial
Court/Illaqa Magistrate concerned had been directed to record the statements
of the parties with regard to the genuineness and authenticity of the
compromise.
5. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Ambala, has submitted a report, vide letter dated 12.05.2026,
which indicates that the parties had appeared before the Magistrate and got
recorded their respective statements with regard to the validity of the
compromise. As per the report, the compromise arrived at between the
parties is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence
and out of free will of the parties.
6. The Hon'ble Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
Ors.” 2012(10) SCC 303 has held as under:-
“48. The question is with regard to the inherent power of
the High Court in quashing the criminal proceedings against an
offender who has settled his dispute with the victim of the crime
but the crime in which he is allegedly involved is not
compoundable Under Section 320 of the Code.
POONAM NEGI
2026.05.15 16:34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##49. Section 482 of the Code, as its very language
suggests, saves the inherent power of the High Court which it
has by virtue of it being a superior court to prevent abuse of the
process of any court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.
It begins with the words, 'nothing in this Code' which means
that the provision is an overriding provision. These words leave
no manner of doubt that none of the provisions of the Code
limits or restricts the inherent power. The guideline for exercise
of such power is provided in Section 482 itself i.e., to prevent
abuse of the process of any court or otherwise to secure the
ends of justice. As has been repeatedly stated that Section 482
confers no new powers on High Court; it merely safeguards
existing inherent powers possessed by High Court necessary to
prevent abuse of the process of any Court or to secure the ends
of justice. It is equally well settled that the power is not to be
resorted to if there is specific provision in the Code for the
redress of the grievance of an aggrieved party. It should be
exercised very sparingly and it should not be exercised as
against the express bar of law engrafted in any other provision
of the Code.
50. In different situations, the inherent power may be
exercised in different ways to achieve its ultimate objective.
Formation of opinion by the High Court before it exercises
inherent power Under Section 482 on either of the twin
objectives, (i) to prevent abuse of the process of any court or
(ii) to secure the ends of justice, is a sine qua non.
51. In the very nature of its constitution, it is the judicial
obligation of the High Court to undo a wrong in course of
administration of justice or to prevent continuation of
unnecessary judicial process. This is founded on the legal
maxim quando lex aliquid alicui concedit, conceditur et id sine
qua res ipsa esse non potest. The full import of which is
whenever anything is authorised, and especially if, as a matter
of duty, required to be done by law, it is found impossible to do
POONAM NEGI
2026.05.15 16:34
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE4##that thing unless something else not authorised in express terms
be also done, may also be done, then that something else will be
supplied by necessary intendment. Ex debito justitiae is inbuilt
in such exercise; the whole idea is to do rea
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.