IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SONIKA – Appellant
Versus
JASWINDER SINGH – Respondent
TA_1717_2025
##PAGE1##
TA-1717-2025 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
134 TA-1717-2025
Date of Decision: 15.05.2026
Sonika .… Petitioner
Versus
Jaswinder Singh .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Petitioner-Sonika is present in person.
Mr. Ashutosh Sharma, Advocate for the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1. By way of filing the present petition, the petitioner-wife is
seeking transfer of 02 petitions i.e. (a) petition No. HMA-94-2021
(Annexure P-1) titled as ‘Jaswinder Singh vs. Sonika’ filed by
respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
(for short-‘the Act’); and (b) petition No. HMA-1930-2024 dated
05.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) titled as ‘Sonika vs. Jaswinder Singh’ filed
by the petitioner-wife under Section 9 of the Act, pending before the
learned Family Court, Rupnagar to the Family Court, Chandigarh.
2. The petitioner who is present in person, inter alia, submits
as under:
i) The parties solemnized marriage on 11.12.2019
according to Hindu Rites and Ceremonies.
ii) No child was born out of the said wedlock.
RISHU KATARIA
2026.05.18 19:48
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgment.
##PAGE2##TA-1717-2025 -2-
iii) Due to matrimonial discord the parties are living
separately since February, 2020.
iv) At present the petitioner-wife is working as Clerk on
contract basis with the State Legal Services
Authority, U.T. Chandigarh. As such she is unable to
avail leave to travel frequently from Chandigarh to
Rupnagar to pursue both the aforementioned
petitions. It is pointed out that due to frequent leaves
taken by her, a show-cause notice dated 10.10.2023
(Annexure P-3) has been issued to the petitioner to
avoid being absent from duty.
v) Petitioner who is present in person submits that the
present job as Clerk is the only source of her income
as, the respondent-husband is not paying anything by
way of maintenance.
vi) There are 03 cases filed by the petitioner-wife which
are pending adjudication at District Courts,
Chandigarh i.e. (i) under the provisions of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,
2005; (ii) under Section 144 BNSS of 2023 (Section
125 Cr.P.C.) for maintenance; and (iii) complaint
with the U.T. Police for registration of case against
the respondent-husband.
3. It is accordingly prayed that the present petition may be
allowed; and both the petitions bearing Nos. (a) HMA-94-2021
RISHU KATARIA
2026.05.18 19:48
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgment.
##PAGE3##TA-1717-2025 -3-
(Annexure P-1) titled as ‘Jaswinder Singh vs. Sonika’ filed by
respondent-husband; and (b) HMA-1930-2024 dated 05.09.2024
(Annexure P-2) titled as ‘Sonika vs. Jaswinder Singh’ filed by the
petitioner-wife petition be transferred from the learned Family Court,
Rupnagar to the Family Court at Chandigarh.
4. Per Contra, learned counsel for the respondent vehemently
opposes the submissions advanced by the petitioner who is present person
and submits that the petitioner herself has filed petition bearing No.
HMA-870-2024 dated 30.09.2024 (Annexure P-2) under Section 9 of the
Act before the learned Family Court, Rupnangar. On a Court query, the
petitioner clarifies that although, the aforesaid petition (Annexure P-2) is
pending before the learned Family Court, Rupnagar, however, the counsel
representing her in the said case has refused to pursue the same as, he is
also facing threats from the respondent-side.
5. No other argument has been made on behalf of the parties. I
have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully gone through the
case file. I find no merit in the submissions advanced on behalf of the
respondent.
6. Besides the facts as noticed hereinabove, which constitute
sufficient grounds for transfer, the legal position in such like cases is well
established. In this regard, judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
rendered in N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha,” 2022
Live Law (SC) 627, is notable, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has
held as under:-
“9. The cardinal principle for exer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.