IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ISHA DHINGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
CRM-M_27478_2026
##PAGE1##
(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)-1- (cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
102
CRM-M-27478-2026
Decided on: 15.05.2026
ISHA DHINGRA …...Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present: Mr. Jangjit Singh Dahiya, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.
****
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short -
‘the BNSS’) seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.148 dated
05.06.2020 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 420, 468, 471, 506, 34,
120-B and 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short – ‘the IPC’) and
Section 24 of the Immigration Act, registered at Police Station Sector
13-17, Panipat.
2. On 05.06.2020, complainant Gurmeet Singh made a police
complaint that in April 2019, the present petitioner allured the
complainant via Facebook that the petitioner is instrumental in sending
people to Canada and she along with co-accused, namely, Aakash is in
the business of sending people abroad. Believing the petitioner, the
complainant paid an amount of Rs.15 lakh to the petitioner and co-
accused Arun Dhingra. Thereafter, visa and air tickets were given to the
complainant which were found to be forged.
SONIA PURI
2026.05.30 09:58
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)-2- (cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the
petitioner has been falsely involved in this case, as she is merely a
salaried employee in the office of accused, namely, Akash and Sameer. It
is further submitted that a compromise has been effected with the
complainant and that the complainant has no objection in case the
petitioner is granted the concession of anticipatory bail.
4. Notice of motion.
5. In pursuance of advance notice, Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr.
DAG, Haryana, put in appearance and accepted notice on behalf of
respondent-State and opposed the grant of concession of anticipatory bail
to the petitioner while submitting that there are serious allegations of
forgery qua the present petitioner; that a visa was given to the
complainant, which, during investigation has been found to be forged and
fabricated and after due verification from the competent authorities. It is
further contended that the petitioner has played an effective role in the
commission of alleged offence and she actively remained in contact with
the complainant and also received an amount of Rs.5 lakh in her bank
account, and as such, the contentions raised by learned counsel by the
petitioner that she is merely an employee of the travel agency is not
sustainable; she is required for custodial interrogation to know the details
of the forged and fabricated document i.e. visa and to unearth other
accomplices having nexus with such racket, whereby, innocent persons
have been allured on the pretext of sending them abroad and, as such,
prayed for dismissal of the present petition.
SONIA PURI
2026.05.30 09:58
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:8)(cid:4)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:5)(cid:10)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)(cid:11)-3- (cid:1)
(cid:1)
(cid:1)
6. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, has put in appearance
by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant and admitted
the factum of compromise having been arrived at between the parties and
submitted that he has no objection in case the petitioner is granted the
concession of anticipatory ba
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.